History

The Worst Weather Disaster in New England History

The worst weather disaster in New England history wasn’t a blizzard or a hurricane. In fact, chances are you’ve never heard of it.

The Worst Weather Disaster in New England History

Coffee By Design | Portland, Maine

Photo Credit : Katherine Keenan
“The Worst Weather Disaster in New England History” by William B. Meyer was first published in the January, 1997 issue of Yankee Magazine.
The Worst Weather Disaster in New England History
“The Worst Weather Disaster in New England History” by William B. Meyer was first published in the January, 1997 issue of Yankee Magazine.

The Worst Weather Disaster in New England History

Bad weather is a fact of life in New England; to be remembered for long, it has to be bad indeed. Perhaps half a dozen legendary spells could compete for the title of the region’s worst ever. For death and destruction at sea there is the Portland gale of 1898; for disruption of life on land, the blizzards of 1888 and 1978; for the most damage to property, the twin hurricanes Connie and Diane of 1955; for overall harm, the hurricane of 1938; and for greatest loss of life, the heat wave of 1911. The heat wave of 1911? Chances are you’ve never heard of it, though you’ve probably heard of most of the others. They’re all secure in the meteorological Hall of Shame. The most deadly spell of weather that has ever affected New England is not. We remember 1816, the year without a summer, but not 1911, the year that had altogether too much of one. That summer began forgettably enough. Pleasant June temperatures, a bit below normal, offered no distraction from the rest of the month’s news. An old dictator was toppled in Mexico; a new king was crowned in London. At home, Congress debated freer trade with Canada; New England’s senators mobilized to save the Portsmouth Navy Yard from closure; Boston saw its first airplane in the sky overhead; the Red Sox struggled. But July took over in a different spirit, and it would be weeks before news other than the weather could claim anyone’s full attention once more. On Saturday, July 1, temperatures across New England were near 90º. They neared 100º on the second, the hottest day in a decade, and the first deaths and hospitalizations were reported. Monday the third broke all-time high readings, with a temperature of 106º Fahrenheit in Boston. The new records lasted for only a day. After an oppressive night, New Englanders spent a Fourth of July hotter than any day in their official weather history — hotter, too, than any in history in New Orleans, Mobile, or Atlanta. The Weather Bureau in Boston announced a high of 103.6º. At the Nashua and Lawrence stations, it registered 106º.
worst weather disaster
The July 6, 1911 edition of the Meriden Morning Record reported on the many deaths and drownings caused by the oppressive heat throughout the region, the worst weather disaster in New England history.
Never was Independence Day observed more listlessly. The turn-of-the-century Fourth was a notoriously rowdy occasion. In 1911, though, it took little urging from newspapers and civic leaders to keep it “safe and sane.” But the unaccustomed quiet was the only comfort to be had, and there was no promise of relief to celebrate, either. The fifth was nearly as hot as the day before. The heat broke briefly on the sixth, with violent and destructive storms in many places, but it returned in a day or two and drove temperatures back into three digits on the tenth and 11th. Not until midmonth was the siege finally lifted. The temperatures were unheard of, but that was not all. What made them really lethal was the stillness of the air. Either the wind had itself been prostrated by the heat, or it had flown elsewhere in search of cooler weather. Flown south, perhaps. “Boston people have regarded Jacksonville, Florida, as exclusively a winter resort,” observed the Boston Transcript on the 11th, “but yesterday it was eight degrees cooler than this city.” Even along the coast, the fabled sea breeze was hardly to be felt. Only a few corners escaped the worst heat: the islands (Nantucket stayed below 90º all July) and the far eastern end of Maine (at Eastport, where a sea breeze did spring up, it never exceeded 85º). The White Mountains sweltered in the upper nineties with the rest of New England. Water alone offered relief, and hundreds of thousands sought it out. Revere and Nantasket beaches for days became the second- and third-largest cities in New England. Inlanders resorted to any lake, river, or pond nearby, and tallies of drownings divided the headlines with lists of heatstroke victims. Mayors across New England kept city parks open after dark for the throngs who could not sleep in their furnacelike interiors; Boston Common at night became “a vast dormitory.” The cities suffered the most. The crowding together of buildings, the artificial heat released, the replacement of grass and trees by stone, brick, and asphalt raised the actual temperatures far above even the records being set in the open country. The Weather Bureau’s reports irritated anew an old sore point in its relations with the public. All of its city stations were located atop the tallest buildings, in parks amid grass and trees or on the sparsely settled fringe. The Boston office crowned the Federal Building tower downtown. Shaded thermometers at street level showed ten degrees or more warmer than the official readings throughout the heat wave. For long periods they exceeded 110º.
worst weather disaster
Boys in New York City find relief by licking a large block of ice during the 1911 heat wave, the worst weather disaster in New England history.
Photo Credit : Bain Collection (Library of Congress)
If the urban heat-island effect was obscured in the official weather figures, it was clear in the mortality statistics. The larger the city, the higher the death rate from heatstroke. The entire toll outdid that of any other New England weather catastrophe. The hurricane of 1938 may have cost as many as 600 lives in the region; the Portland gale, 400 to 500. In Massachusetts alone, more than 1,100 certificates recorded the heat as cause of death during July 1911 (against a few dozen in all of 1910). Increase in total mortality is the best measure of a heat wave’s impact. Deaths in Massachusetts that July exceeded the normal for the month for the month by 1,400, in New England overall by 2,000. Why, then, is the great heat wave so little remembered? In part, because it sent us no eye-catching picture postcards of its passage through New England: no towering snowdrifts, smashed seaside neighborhoods, or rescue boats floating past attic windows. Heat waves are the neutron bombs of natural disasters; they kill, quietly and invisibly, with little damage to property. Perhaps, too, it has been forgotten because it was so atypical. July 1911 was in every way the reverse of the usual New England weather calamity: not too cold, but too hot; not stormy, but unnaturally calm. If it is not remembered among the annals of New England weather, it is because it was not New England weather at all. That is what made it so devastating, the way flash floods are one of the worst hazards in the arid West, the way the South can cope well with heat but is paralyzed by a few inches of snow. New England buildings designed to keep out the cold kept in the heat all too efficiently. Habits acquired in the usual stimulating climate were hard to change when the heat demanded a slower pace. Having forgotten the past, are we likely to repeat it? A month as hot and still as July 1911 would probably do much less damage today. Weather events may recur, but they never affect the same society twice. New England in 1911 was a different world and overall a more vulnerable one. It was modern enough to suffer from the heat of congested cities; it was not yet modern enough to profit from devices available to us nowadays. Ventilation back then was poor, electric fans a costly novelty, refrigeration primitive, and home air-conditioning unknown; strenuous exertion was routine on and off the job, the automobile and the elevator reserved to a favored few; the poorest neighborhoods were crowded and oven-like beyond anything known today. Yet heat today remains a deadly hazard to many people: in particular, infants, the elderly, and all who lack access to air-conditioning. A brutally hot July in 1995 took more than 700 lives in Chicago. Many of them could have been saved with early emergency measures, had not Chicagoans, like New Englanders, forgotten how devastating heat waves can be. And while nothing is certain about global climate change, higher summer temperatures are one of the likeliest prospects. Had you ever heard of the 1911 heat wave, the worst weather disaster in New England history? “The Worst Weather Disaster in New England History” by William B. Meyer was first published in the January, 1997, issue of Yankee Magazine.

SEE MORE: Winter Weather Sayings Can’t Be True, Can They? | New England Humor Worst Hurricanes in New England History A Fatal Mistake | The Sinking of the El Faro 

Yankee Magazine

More by Yankee Magazine

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Login to post a comment

  1. I found this article very interesting, especially since I’m a New Englander. Somewhere years ago, I had heard of this disaster, but don’t recall I had read anything about it. The research that William B. Meyer did to write this article was tremendous, and I thank him for it.

  2. Most informative/interesting article. A later New England disaster I survived, but in which I was severely injured, was the 1953 Worcester tornado. To this day I don’t know what happened to me, as I suffered a memory-loss concussion while walking home from work at Norton Company. As destruction swirled around and through our house, my mom, brothers and the family dog all lay flat on the living room floor, covering their heads with hands. Full of dirt, sand, glass & disbelief, their lives were spared, as was my dad’s when a ceiling beam plunged through his (unoccupied) office chair at Norton Company. Despite the loss of our irreparably damaged house, we were truly & forever grateful that our lives were spared.

  3. I remember hearing on the radio that day about the tornado in Worcester, MA. My parents and I went outside in Manchester, CT approximately fifty-five miles southwest of Worcester. As I recall, the sky had an odd yellowish color to it, not the usual blue with puffy white clouds. We wondered if it was the result of the tornado. I was thirteen.

  4. This is a prime example of why I read Yankee; not too surprised to find that it dates back to ’97; if it ran today,it would no doubt be accompanied by pages and pages of Heat Wave Recipes. Ha ha. Thanks…..

  5. Thank you for bringing back this most enlightening and disturbing article. In today’s era of “global warming” awareness, perhaps folks in Boston and Chicago will be more cognizant of how deadly heat waves can be. Having said that, as a resident of Boston, I truly hope neither we city dwellers nor our more rural New England neighbors ever have to survive such blistering heat over a prolonged period of time.

  6. How interesting it was to read this article, I grew up in Maine and had never heard this story, But then again my parents weren’t even born when it happened.

  7. I remember on a warm summer afternoon in Uxbridge walking home when suddenly the sky turned dark and the winds picked up. Made it home safely with no real damage in the area but then we started hearing about the storm that had caused massive damage in the Worcester area. My dad took us to Sutton a few days later and we could not believe the devastation that the tornado had caused. Trees were torn out of the ground and houses and barns were reduced to piles of splintered wood. The trees that survived were covered with clothes and debris and studs pierced the trunks of trees like spears. These images have never left my mind after all these years!!!

  8. I am so glad I read all the way down this New England today email, I never knew of this event. Thank you Yankee!

  9. I remember reading this article the first time it was published and thought that it was interesting and thought provoking. This re-telling of it brought two things to mind. First the recent spate of “heat waves” here in New Hampshire during June and early July this year. Second, I never knew that New York City was in any part of New England! Heavens, we keep reading in “Yankee” how there is some debate as to whether Connecticut is part of New England or more part of the “tri-states Region” and yet here we are looking at a bunch of boys licking an ice block in New Your City during the New England 1911 Heat Wave. Interesting.

  10. This was a very interesting and well written article. My parents were born and raised in Maine, as well as all my 9 siblings, but I had never heard of this disaster. I would like to thank Mr. Meyer for this interesting article.